2020 Lamborghini Huracán Evo Pros and Cons Review: More With Less

Pros
  • Amazing engine
  • Absolutely planted
  • Outrageous handling

Cons
  • Body structure issues
  • Infotainment UX
  • No room for stuff


The Lamborghini Huracán Evo had somewhat of a chip on its shoulder coming into the 2020 Best Driver's Competition. See, the Performante version of the Huracán had won it all back in 2018, but that was a fully built, track-focused, special performance edition of a supercar. The Evo? It's "just" the midcycle refresh of the plain-old entry-level two-door Lambo.

Let's be honest, the Huracán itself is just a gussied-up Audi R8, right? Sure, when Sant'Agata makes an all-in move with the likes of a Performante, it can win. But just a regular production car? In bocca al lupo. We probably should mention, however, that the Evo does get the Performante's 630-hp humdinger of a V-10, which screamed loudly enough to break the sound meter at Sonoma Raceway even though we were at Laguna Seca. I kid. A little.

What is the Evo? Essentially, you get Performante levels of straight-line thrust but without the controversial active aerodynamics system called ALA. Why controversial? To sum up years of keyboard warrior YouTube and Instagram comments quickly, if this sort of aero sorcery was so effective, surely the wizards of Formula 1 racing would have thought of it first. Never mind that Lambo holds the patent.

We also had a nice demonstration of what a Performante with the ALA removed performs like. This year, our resident racer Randy Pobst went 2.85 seconds slower per lap in the Evo around Laguna Seca than he did in the Perf: 1:32.85 versus 1:30.00. We asked the Lamborghini representative with us why that would be, and that person plainly said, "The Evo doesn't have ALA." Straight from the cavallo's mouth, people. Also, the Evo has four-wheel steering. The Performante doesn't.

2020 Lamborghini Huracán Evo: Raging Bull

ALA or not, we like this car. First of all, the Evo drives great. Tearing through the valleys that define California's Coast and Transverse ranges, the Huracán Evo lulls you into that perfect state of driving bliss. That last part means you're at peace with the supercar.

"I've driven Lambos that were twitchy and itchy," editor in chief Mark Rechtin said, "but after driving the BDC-winning Huracán Performante a few years back, I learned to trust the raging bull."

The Evo is identical in that regard. It's also pretty similar to the Performante on the track. "Tremendous cornering grip, quick turn-in, real quick steering response, but absolutely planted in the back," Pobst said. Every judge enjoyed and felt confident in the Evo on the street and on the racetrack.

Stil, the Huracán Evo isn't perfect. Pobst somehow got the brakes to fade a little after a few laps, which he chalked up to new pads. Something in the passenger door was loose and rattling over bumps. The bulkhead between the cabin and the engine creaked like an old wood floor when you were entering or exiting a driveway. The iPad-sized touchscreen in the center console is full of indecipherable alien petroglyphs and impossible to use while driving.

 

2020 Lamborghini Huracán Evo: Taking It by the Horns

Plus, it doesn't seem to do a whole bunch when you're parked. If you're going on a trip, don't bring a passenger, as the second seat is your luggage compartment. The Huracán Evo was also 0.58 second slower around Laguna Seca than the Ferrari F8 Tributo, though Pobst attributed the twin-turbocharged F8's lap time to its extra 81 hp and 125 lb-ft of torque.

With the Lamborghini Huracán Evo, the good definitely outweighs the bad. "You can drive it like you stole it, and it'll be there for you," road test editor Chris Walton said. "The steering and handling are world-class. It makes all the noise."

Regardless of where it places in this year's competition, know that the men and women of Sant'Agata are dead serious about making world-class "super sports cars," as they insist on calling them. The Evo is the latest in what's becoming a long line.

2020 Ferrari F8 Tributo Pros and Cons Review: Thrills and Chills

Pros

  • Missile acceleration
  • Quick cornering
  • Bumpy-road mode


Cons

  • Wooden brakes
  • Too-light steering feel
  • Looming snap oversteer


In reviewing the 2020 Ferrari F8 Tributo with proper clarity, there is a need to go back a few years and admit with mild chagrin that our 2017 Best Driver's Car-winning Ferrari 488 GTB might have been a ringer. This goes beyond Ferrari sending four factory techs to work day and night to be sure everything ran perfectly. (By contrast, Porsche traditionally sends Frank the PR guy, who watches the Italian antics with mild amusement.)

Rather, the 488's testing numbers we posted were more akin to what the 661-hp GTB would have produced had it been chipped to 800 hp. And well-placed sources with deep connections say that might indeed have been the case. But what's that the old salts say? "If you ain't cheatin', you ain't tryin'." It would be far from the first time a manufacturer sent a hot car to a motoring magazine's shootout. Hey, innocent until proven guilty, right?

2020 Ferrari F8 Tributo: One Scary Stallion

Fast forward to this year's contest, and witness the 488's spiritual successor, the F8 Tributo. It's lighter, and it has more power. But is it faster? Not according to our test numbers, where the old 488 GTB was quicker to 60 mph, neck and neck at the quarter, and quicker around the figure eight with a much higher average g load. Plus, it turned an astonishing 0.6 second quicker lap time around Laguna Seca raceway.

The F8 Tributo had issues, too, the most serious of which being its wooden brakes (not our first experience in a Ferrari) that required a trackside rebuild—an estimated $20,000-plus fix at your neighborhood Ferrari dealer. Then, after an incomplete bedding-in by a Ferrari tech, the F8 had mild-mannered pro racer Randy Pobst swearing a blue streak as he blew through Laguna Seca's crucial Turn 11 and into the gravel trap.

So what's the deal with the F8 Tributo? "Intermittent thrills and chills followed by clenched teeth and relief," road test editor Chris Walton said. "This was the only car that spooked me at Laguna Seca."

The F8's super-quick steering ratio, combined with its too-light steering feel, prompted some nervy moments when aiming for the apex. Pobst's answer: CT-Off mode, where the nannies still deliver a we-got-this reassurance to the driver.

Features editor Scott Evans also took issue with corner-exit traction: "Leaving a tight corner with any gusto felt like dancing on a landmine. The car can't put the power down when there's any steering in it. You're asking for snappy power oversteer. No thanks. This car feels dicey when you push it all the way."

However, going fast in a straight line to impress your passenger is something the Ferrari missile does very well, senior features editor Jonny Lieberman said, adding that the dual-clutch transmission shifts "like a buttered hummingbird" and that the column-mounted aluminum paddle shifters are a tactile delight.

Once off-track, everyone praised Ferrari's "bumpy road" driving mode, which turns freeway expansion joints and big rig-induced chop into afterthoughts.

2020 Ferrari F8 Tributo: Quiet Riot

Some judges were underwhelmed by the F8's rather tame engine and exhaust notes. There was no shrieking, no sound of shredding paper. Just a humdrum thrum. Even during Pobst's hot laps, the Ferrari didn't blow up the track's 92-dB sound meter; the Lamborghini did it in fifth-gear coasting at 60 mph. This impacts the driver, as well, as there is no aural hint that the engine is approaching redline—thank goodness for the shift-alert lights mounted in the steering wheel rim.

And although this exotica comes with an expectedly steep price tag (the F8's $277,480 base price roared up to $386,288 with options), we couldn't determine which was the worse price gouging: charging $34,000 for carbon-fiber wheels (also part of a big $18,500 package on the Ford Mustang Shelby GT500—the wheels are made by the same supplier, too) or $4,200 for Apple CarPlay compatibility (a feature that's baked into the price of a Kia). In looking at the total package, we advise you to do the math.

Plug-In Hybrid Jeep Wrangler 4xe Rubicon Costs Over Fifty Thousand Dollars

Early EV adopters paid a hefty premium for the right to say "they got it first." Tesla, for example, didn't release its budget-friendly Model 3 until six years after the luxurious flagship Model S made its debut. New 48-volt mild hybrid and plug-in hybrid tech has followed the very same trend, often ending up in pricier versions of a given model. The BMW X5 xDrive45e, for instance, is the most expensive X5 you can buy outside of the M-branded performance models. Ditto the Toyota RAV4 Prime plug-in. Jeep is following much the same trend with the new Wrangler 4xe, and placing it near the tippy top of the already pricey Wrangler lineup.

The plug-in hybrid Wrangler 4xe will be available in two of the Wrangler's nicer trims—either Sahara or Rubicon, and both will be available as "Launch Editions." This leaves the door open for the 4xe treatment to be applied to lesser, more affordable models in the future. The Sahara model will start at $49,490 before an available $7,500 federal tax credit is applied (a regular Sahara starts at $40,755 with a gas V-6 engine). The off-road ready Rubicon 4xe is priced from $53,190, but the same $7,500 tax credit is applicable there, too. Like the Sahara, the Rubicon 4xe costs much more than its gas sibling, which starts at $43,710.

That means pre-incentives, the Wrangler 4xe Rubicon carries the highest base price of any Wrangler you can buy, the High Altitude trim included. Of course, fiddling around with the various engine options on the Rubicon and High Altitude surely can make them pricier than the 4xe Rubicon, but still.

While we expect the Rubicon 4xe's bragging right, such as it is, to be one-upped once the eight-cylinder Wrangler 392 arrives on the scene next year, it's still a very pretty penny indeed. That said, you do get a lot of kit in exchange for your hard-earned cash. The electrified 2.0-liter turbocharged I-4 makes 375 horsepower and 470 lb-ft of torque. Jeep says that it will take car of the 0-60 sprint in 6 seconds flat. That, according to our test numbers, would make it the quickest factory Wrangler ever, and by a margin of well over a second, too.

Other standard niceties include 20-inch wheels, leather seats, led lighting, an 8.4-inch infotainment display, a nine-speaker Alpine audio system, Selec-Trac full-time 4WD system, and Dana 44 HD wide axles on the Sahara model. The Rubicon gets all the aforementioned goodies, but the Selec-Trac 4WD system is swapped for a more heavy-duty, 4:1 Rock-Trac full-time 4WD system. You also get blue stickers and blue tow hooks on the outside just so everyone knows you're driving something electrified.

According to Jeep, Wrangler 4xe models will hit dealerships by March of 2021.

2020 Porsche 718 Cayman GT4 Pros and Cons Review: Ultimate Track Tool

Pros

  • Supreme balance
  • Fantastic teacher
  • Great track tool


Cons

  • Jittery suspension
  • Tire noise
  • Underpowered


This car has all the makings of a Best Driver's Car winner: engine mounted in the proper place directly behind the driver and revving to a glorious 8,000 rpm, a delightful manual shifter (unique this year), unflappable carbon-ceramic brakes with excellent pedal feel, and sticky Pilot Sport Cup 2 tires. This is a sports car that punches way above its 3,127-pound featherweight status. The 2020 Porsche 718 Cayman GT4 lapped Laguna Seca quicker than a Ferrari 458, AMG GT 63 4Matic+, and various flavors of Nissan GT-R.

Like any Porsche I have ever driven, I can tell it's a Porsche in the way all of its controls have matched efforts and responses. Nothing in the steering, pedals, or shifter is too heavy or too light. All respond with exactly what you'd expect from your effort or request. I could be blindfolded and tell you that I was driving a Porsche, and from the exhaust note, I could probably tell you which one. "The engine noise, this is what an exotic car costing three times as much should sound like," editor-in-chief Mark Rechtin said. "Thunderous, guttural, startling and snarling."

Sure, it rides harshly on the street and makes a ton of tire noise. But say it with me: "It's a GT4." So yeah. On the twisting highway portion of our drive, it felt more like a dance than a flogging. It was absolutely in its element and hanging on the tailpipe of 600- to 700-horsepower cars that cost tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars more. "It does everything right, all the time, so you can just work on your lines and your braking zones," features editor Scott Evans said. "Anyone can get in this car and drive to their limit immediately, then work on increasing their limit."

Also, as a Porsche, it responds to and rewards being driven hard at the track. The Cayman GT4 gets better the harder you drive it. And although it has the "lowest" horsepower rating in this year's field, it succeeds as a "momentum" car, and that's how it's been engineered. (However, as senior features editor Jonny Lieberman noted: "This thing has 14 more horsepower than the original Viper with half the displacement and four fewer cylinders. ")

There's no blast from a turbocharger or extra motor, no all-wheel drive, no secret trick or electronic gizmo making it go faster. Just six cylinders' worth of atmospheric air and fuel burning. "It immediately inspires my racing instincts and urges me to drive flat-out," resident pro driver Randy Pobst said. "The reward is great pleasure and satisfaction of my driving addiction."


That said, some judges found the track-focused suspension too immediate and jitterbuggy on less refined back roads or around town (but in a nod to Gen X drivers, the Cayman still offers a CD player).

It was the first car I took out at Laguna Seca, and it was a great way to refamiliarize myself with the track. The GT4 is such a great instructor. "Dammit, drive me and trust me," it goads. What you do matters, so find the perfect line and enjoy. The GT4 provides so much "we got this" that I found myself pushing and pushing, but the car was always there for me. Such a great quality that only a few cars provide.

"This is a wonderful sports car—light, potent, precise, and deceptively capable," Lieberman said. "Once you accept that it's not a 911, holy hell does this thing cook!"

2020 Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe Pros and Cons Review: Defying Logic

Pros

  • Supercar performance
  • Well-hidden weight
  • Great fun to drive


Cons

  • Sick-pumpkin appearance
  • High price
  • It's an SUV


"How do you explain it?" I asked the Porsche PR man standing along the K-wall at WeatherTech Raceway Laguna Seca.

Legendary wheelman/human lap timer Randy Pobst had just finished his hot laps in the 2021 Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe during our 2020 Best Driver's Car, and something had gone, well, not quite right. Quite wrong some might even say. See, Porsche is owned by the Volkswagen Group, as is Audi, and Audi owns Lamborghini. At our 2019 BDC, Lambo's Urus had set the SUV lap record at Laguna Seca, at 1:40.90. You maybe see where this is going. The Porsche, which stickers for $82,559 less than the Lambo, beat the Urus with a 1:40.27 lap. "Well," Mr. Porsche PR Man said, his eyes rolling up into his skull and looking for a way to spin it, "the rear brake rotors are a bit bigger." Yeah, 1.5 inches (16.1 versus the Urus' 14.6) is a bit bigger, if not much, much bigger.


Did I mention that we loved the Porsche SUV? "This thing's better than the Ferrari—it stops!" Pobst half-joked. Said a very relaxed editor-in-chief Mark Rechtin: "I'm trailing the Porsche 911 Turbo S and watching it skitter and seesaw over these awful agricultural road bumps that haven't been paved in decades. Meanwhile, I have the Cayenne in Comfort shock mode, and I'm just gliding over everything, doing 110 mph."

Features editor Scott Evans was a bit more agitated in his praise. "This thing just breaks my brain," he said. "I can think of quite a few sports cars that don't handle this fluidly and a ton that don't ride this well while doing it. And this thing's an SUV with an off-road mode. This shouldn't be possible."

The key point Evans raised is that quite a few sports cars aren't as good to drive, which is true for (almost) every other SUV ever made, as well. (The Cayenne was invited to Best Driver's Car based on its dominating win in our Super SUV shootout.)

I'm still trying to figure out exactly what makes this thing tick. When I first drove it, I was stymied trying to identify what, aside from the roof and an 18mm-wider rear track, differentiates the Turbo Coupe from the regular Cayenne Turbo. I still don't know.

I will say that my single best moment of this year's Best Driver's Car was hunting down the mid-engine Chevy Corvette at Laguna Seca while driving the Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe. Ridiculous, I know, but here we are. I never actually caught the Chevy, but if we had stayed out for a few more laps, I'm claiming I would have. Yes, I was driving as hard as I could and my colleague in the Corvette obviously wasn't, but still.

The Porsche just makes it so easy; burying the throttle solves everything. "The degree of confidence that I have, as a non-professional, non-racing driver, in this car (ahem SUV) is incredible," Rechtin said. Amen. SUVs aren't supposed to behave like this on a racetrack. They're supposed to oversteer and not stop and just kinda suck. The Cayenne Turbo Coupe? It came alive.

Does that make the Cayenne Turbo Coupe a contender for the podium? With this year's pack, not really. But most years we have 12 entrants, and this year due to the health crisis we were limited to seven. I would posit that, had we delivered a full field, the Cayenne would have finished seventh out of 12, not seventh of seven. And that is a heck of a result for an SUV competing against supercars, an SUV that not only blitzes a racetrack but also hauls four people and their stuff in complete comfort for a weekend out of town.

The Lamborghini Jalpa Is a Forgotten Lambo Supercar

Lamborghini Jalpa Essential History

Despite the myopia of popular car culture, the Countach wasn't the only Lamborghini produced in the 1980s. Even with the public's overwhelming fixation on Lambo's superstar V-12 wedge, a small number of V-8-powered mid-engine sports cars were sold alongside the bigger, badder, and significantly more expensive Countach. They don't get nearly as much attention then, either, but compared to the rarer and even lesser-known Urraco and Silhouette, the Lamborghini Jalpa, produced between 1981 and 1988, was the most popular entry-level Lamborghini until the Gallardo's arrival in the early 2000s.


 Stylistically, the Bertone-designed Jalpa is very much an evolution of the earlier Silhouette, incorporating the Silhouette's transverse mid-engine design and its ultra-angular profile. Additionally, Lamborghini offered the Jalpa exclusively as a targa-roofed model, unlike the Countach, which never officially had its roof chopped from the factory.

Power comes from a carbureted 3.5-liter DOHC V-8, capable of 255 horsepower and 225 pound-feet of torque—an output not too bad for the era, and roughly comparable to the contemporary Ferrari 308. Shift the five-speed manual transmission quickly, and it'll run a zero-to-60-mph sprint in around six seconds, on its way to a top speed of 155 mph.

Even compared to Ferrari at the time, Lamborghini was still a very, very small player in the global auto market, and the Jalpa's total production run of just 410 units reinforces this. As the 1980s progressed, sales of the Jalpa tapered off significantly, causing Lamborghini to cut production after 1988. This would be the final entry-level Lambo until the Gallardo, and the final V-8-powered Lamborghini until the current Urus SUV.

Lamborghini Jalpa Highlights

In this era of supercar saturation and keyboard-pounding experts, it's reasonably difficult to stump the crowd at Cars and Coffee with something from a brand as well known as Lamborghini, but we reckon rolling up in a Jalpa should have more than a few supercar kids scratching their heads. You simply don't see the Jalpa cruising around as much as you do some of the even rarer supercars of the era.

There are a few reasons for this, chief among them being a distinct lack of buzz for the Jalpa among collectors. As a result, cars in need of major repairs run the risk of being parked and neglected, so there are likely far fewer than the original 400-ish cars remaining in operating condition.

To make matters worse, both the performance and the driving experience don't really mesh well with the Jalpa's troublesome upkeep, so only the truly devout need apply. Our advice? If you are considering a Jalpa due to the relatively low buy-in compared to the Countach and all you're looking for is a vintage Lamborghini experience, move on. Save your pennies for a low-spec Diablo or stretch for a Countach—the Jalpa just isn't worth the trouble.

However, if you're genuinely interested in the Jalpa—which, who can blame you, there aren't many V-8 Lambos out there—it might be the perfect Countach alternative. Just don't come crying when it spends more time in the shop than on the road.

Lamborghini Jalpa Buying Tips

As you've likely gleaned from our advice above, you need to approach Jalpa ownership with a clear head. Your first issue will be parts availability, though Lamborghini's relatively new Polo Storico classics division should be able to help you out, provided you have the deepest of pockets. If you don't have enough cash lying around to buy three or four Jalpas outright, you might have to brave forums and enthusiast clubs to find secondhand components, and then you're at the mercy of the market.

If this hasn't scared you off yet, we advise to be patient and find a clean, well-maintained example that comes with a thick sheaf of repair bills and shop receipts. Resist the trap of the cheap Jalpa—it will only cost you more in the long run. We say this about nearly every vintage car, but we highly, highly suggest taking any potential Jalpa to a brand specialist—preferably one with extensive classic Lamborghini expertise—for a pre-purchase inspection and shakedown so you know what you're dealing with.
Lamborghini Jalpa Recent Auctions

Jalpas aren't exactly a dime a dozen, but there are usually more than a few chances each year to pick up a clean example at auction.

This 8,000-mile 1988 Jalpa that sold for $135,000 is likely one of the cleanest available in 2020 (or any other year)

A clean black 1986 Jalpa owned by the same person for 23 years notched $78,000 through RM Sotheby's earlier this year

A beautiful red 1984 Jalpa restored in 2016 sold for $99,000

Back in 2018, a yellow-over-blue Jalpa changed hands for $70,000

Barrett-Jackson sold this red 1984 Jalpa for $62,000 earlier in 2020
Lamborghini Jalpa Quick Facts

    First year of production: 1981
    Last year of production: 1988
    Original price: $58,000 (1987)
    One of the few mid-engine V-8 Lamborghinis
    The most popular entry-level Lamborghini until the Gallardo
    Looks great, but upkeep might break you and your wallet

DIY Kit Turns the Miata Into a Prewar Alfa Romeo Race Replica

It's nice to know that even if you don't have the financial health often associated with selling a unicorn startup to Google, you can probably at least (someday) afford the replica of your favorite historically significant car. Beyond the myriad Shelby Cobra, GT40, and Porsche 550 Spyder clones that clog your local Cars and Coffee, there's more esoteric stuff to be copied. From the Ferrari 250 GT (GTO Engineering) to the Lola T70 (Broadley Automotive) to the Lotus 11 (Westfield), there's a replica of just about anything available at a relatively reasonable cost—including a new Miata-based DIY kit for a 1950s Alfa Romeo Grand Prix car.
 


Yes, you too can turn your old leaky, greasy, wheezy Mazda roadster into a rather excellent approximation of the Alfa 158/159 that domineered Formula 1 between 1938 and 1951. Other than the obvious excitement that goes along with driving an open-wheeled car, this is a fascinating build, as creating a reasonably priced and well-proportioned racing replica is a tricky endeavor. Most replicars are built on a stripped-down chassis of an existing car, or designed with their own standard chassis with semi-mass production in mind, such as the Shelby Cobra or the GT40.

The market for prewar racing replicas is significantly smaller, so building a bespoke "monoposto" frame/kit is a tough sell. The majority of the monoposto replicas you do see charging around at track days or sitting pretty as garage art are usually enormously expensive one-offs or ultra-low production specials such as the Argentina-based Pur Sang Type 35.

This is where the new Tipo 184 comes in. Inspired by Wheeler Dealers and Master Mechanic presenter Ant Anstead's very own homebrew Alfa 158 replica, the new Miata-based kit is one of the most interesting methods of Miata upcycling we've seen thus far. Anstead appears to be the creative and technical force behind this project and the first ten buyers of the kit will get a chance to build their Tipo 184 in a workshop with Anstead overseeing; he is reportedly working on a full Haynes manual of the Tipo 184 for buyers who would rather perform the conversion in the comfort of their own garage.



 Again, details are still scarce at this point. From the photos available on the barebones website, though, it appears only some of the Miata componentry makes it through the transformation. Looking over a portion of the kit, some of the suspension, brakes, and most of the Mazda's powertrain components bolt onto the supplied spaceframe. Once all the mechanical gubbins are sorted, body panels presumably shaped from fiberglass fit flush on the long tubular shape, along with the single leather seat, wood-rimmed steering wheel, and full metal dash plate for the interior.

 

Even with the modern Miata guts under the cylindrical body, the Tipo 184 does its best impression of a mid-century race rocket: the supplied wheels are excellent analogs of the multi-spoke Borrani wire wheels, there's an exposed elongated exhaust header that runs down the side of the car (complete with four semi-cheesy fake exhaust ports), and the brake discs appear to be shrouded with a metal cover aping the finned drums from the original Alfa.

If you already have a tired Miata sitting around your garden shed, the first ten conversion kits on offer are a relative bargain at £7,499, or $10,100 at the time of this writing. More kits will be made available at a later date, with revised pricing and without the opportunity to build your car alongside Anstead. Of course, if you don't already have a donor car, you'll need to source your own, but Tipo 184 says it can assist in the process. Which generations of the MX-5 qualify is unclear, but based on the name—184 alludes to the 1.8-liter displacement and the four-cylinders—and a photo of a junked NB on the landing page, we suspect only the NA and NB generation Miatas are eligible.

The Weird and Wonderful AMC Rambler Marlin Was a Concept Car Come to Life

The Rambler Marlin remains a rare sight in the world of classic cars, but the car's utterly unique appearance makes them a welcome visitor to any venue. Naturally, that time we heard the Marlin Auto Club was holding a "Gathering of Marlins" at the American Motors Owners Association (AMO) International Convention in Rockford, Illinois, we had to check it out. An even 10 Marlins—mostly 1966 models for their 50th anniversary—turned out for the Gathering, and a pre-production Rambler Tarpon clone even dropped by the AMO's big show the second day. We also got a chance to talk to artist Vince Geraci, head of the American Motors Corporation's design studio in charge of of the AMC Marlin, who gave a brief presentation on the car.

The original concept for the Marlin came in the aerodynamic form of the Rambler Tarpon that debuted at the 1964 Chicago Auto Show, where Richard Teague's design marked a radical departure from the normally conservative look of Rambler's and AMC's offerings. While a bit smaller and lacking some of the refinement of the production Marlin, the Tarpon was essentially the same basic concept: a pillarless coupe that fell somewhere near the personal luxury coupe market. The most striking feature is the sloped fastback roofline that terminates at the rear bumper. That long aerodynamic "teardrop" shape harkened back to mid-century designs like AMC's predecessor, the Nash Airflyte.

Built on a convertible Rambler American, the Rambler Tarpon toured the country on the auto show circuits and came back with favorable enough reactions that AMC president Roy Abernethy greenlit production of the car with a new name, Marlin, for the 1965 model year.



A Pony Car Is Born

Like the Tarpon, the '65 was built on the Rambler American platform, but the overall design was changed from a 2+2 coupe that might have slotted into the burgeoning "pony car" market to a larger 3+3 family coupe designed to appeal to the market's trend toward bigger cars with more appointments.

The request for more passenger room was handled in no small part by Geraci and his designers.

"The feedback came that the headroom in back was insufficient," Geraci said. "They wanted 1.5 inches more of headroom [for the rear seats]; We hated that, thought it took away the sleekness." Nevertheless, Geraci's studio went to work on Abernethy's request for more headroom.

"[Designer] Kevin Goodnough disguised that change very well, I think," Geraci said.

AMC Rambler Insignia

The small trunk opening on the slanted rear wore an unmistakable glass Marlin insignia badge and the overall appearance was spruced up from the Tarpon, including the addition of a lip to the rear deck, giving just a tiny nod to the design's borrowed aeronautical elements.

The Marlin's first two years of production didn't result in high sales volume, but with the introduction of a new AMC platform in 1967, the Marlin got a redesign on the Ambassador's wider track width and wheelbase. "[The '67] was the most attractive Marlin because we were able to get a new package with a new body," Geracis said. That new body included a redesigned roofline and a smaller C-pillar. The company branding also switched all Rambler badging to AMC in 1967, making the '67 officially the "AMC Marlin." Sales struggled with only a few more than 2,000 being sold in 1967 and Marlin production ended.

Even among AMC's contemporary designers, opinions on the Marlin's design are a mixed bag. Bob Nixon, who worked for AMC and Jeep for decades, has been quoted calling the Marlin an "ugly embarrassment." But Geraci still thinks highly of the design and the proof is always in the pudding for him.

"The '65 Marlin is still an attractive car," he said. "When you take it to a car show, in a sea of 150 Corvettes, people always gravitate toward the Marlin."

Build Your Own Roadkill-Style Muscle Truck for the Street or Strip

It is a simple formula really: Take a common American pickup truck, stuff in more power than it deserves, and have fun. Between the Roadkill and Roadkill Garage shows, we have assembled a triple play of fast haulers, appropriately identified as the original (Chevy) "Muscle Truck" the "Mopar Muscle Truck" (MMT) and the "Ford Muscle Truck" (FMT).

These trucks quickly became fan favorites as a group and individually, and continue to appear in Roadkill related content and at Roadkill events. The common thread is that all are short-bed stepsides from the late 60's to early 1970s, built for street performance and all-around vehicular mayhem. Aside of their similarities, each of these muscle trucks has its own personality with distinct differences. Each has a different story to tell, and here they are.




 The Original "Muscle Truck"

Starting it all is the 1974 Chevy C-10 long referred to as simply the "Muscle Truck," but lately we added "Original" to distinguish it from the others. This truck was around well before the Roadkill Show, built by Freiburger and Chad Reynolds in a very Roadkill-like 15-day thrash to make it to the GM Performance Parts LSx Shootout way back in 2008. Freiburger already had the truck, bought from a Craiglist ad for $1,500 as an unassembled project, complete with multi-colored body panels from several donor vehicles. The plus here was the blasted and powdercoated chassis and suspension. To make it a candidate for the LSx Shootout, Freiburger also had a modified GM Performance Parts LS6 crate engine left over from dyno testing for Hot Rod magazine. Combining this truck and engine gave birth to what became the Roadkill muscle truck.

The object was low, loud and mean, with modern power via the modified late model LS6 engine. The LS6 was originally the higher-power version of GM's aluminum LS1 engine found in the Z06 C5 Corvette, and offered as a crate engine from GM with a factory rating of 405 horsepower. Freiburger modified this one with a hotter Crane cam (228/232-degrees duration @ 0.050; 0.600-inch lift) and Crane roller rockers. It an MSD engine management system and ignition, along with a BBK aluminum EFI intake manifold. Freiburger conservatively estimates the output at 475 horsepower. As installed in the truck, the engine's screaming exhaust note has become famous, but it was actually a fluke - the last minute result of using whatever parts were at hand when the truck was originally built. Included here were mid-length headers, separated dual three-inch pipes stepped-up to meet 4-inch Dynomax Race Bullet mufflers, all terminating with downturns in front of the rear axle. The combination resulted in a shrill shriek that made driving it great and painful at the same time.



 The engine is mated to a full manual valve body Dynamic Racing Transmission's Turbo 400 automatic trans equipped with a Gear Vendor over/underdrive unit. A 4000 rpm stall Art Carr torque converter is sandwiched in-between the engine and trans. You'll find a Ford 9-inch rear end salvaged from an F100 perched over the springs, and though it was originally fitted with a spool and 5.13:1 gears, it was re-geared on Roadkill Garage episode 6 with more drivable 3.73:1 gears and a Detroit Locker differential. In that same episode we made other concessions to luxury, adding insulation, carpeting in the cab, a new Pioneer stereo, rear view mirrors, and we finally got the inoperable rear brakes functional. Although these changes might seem to make the truck milder, the violent, shrieking, long-distance burnout ability remains intact.

An overview of the Muscle Truck would not be complete without a description of the suspension and the resulting low-down stance. Originally the truck was equipped with an Air Ride suspension system up front for a total on-the-dirt slam. For simplicity, that setup was recently replaced with coil springs, with CCP lower and Ride Tech upper control arms. The rear has always been leaf springs with Cal Tracs bars for on the track bite. Lowering at the rear is via the previously mentioned axle flip, which works with a "Z" sectioned frame rail for clearance. The whole mess rides on 17×8-inch Cragar Soft 8 wheels at all four corners, running 225 55r-17 front rubber and 31-inch tall 285 60r-17 tires in the back.

The original Muscle Truck is by far the most well-known of our trio of trucks. We haven't counted them, but we suspect this truck has appeared in more MotorTrend shows than any of our other vehicles. Actually, its video glory began before MotorTrend videos were even a thing. What's next? It is really pretty good the way it is now, but don't be surprised to see it appear in a future show for who-knows-what mods and hijinks.


 


 The warmed-over LS6 engine under the hood is just a buzz-saw, ripping rpm and making power with ease. Better still, the reliability is amazing - nothing breaks or leaks, and it never lets us down.

The multi-color exterior look was not by design - it's because this truck's body was pieced together using salvaged and replacement panels from different sources.

A little bit of a revamp happened to the interior recently, including sound-deadening, carpeting, and new stereo. The brutal B&M ProShifter and stylish OEM Buick GS steering wheel have been there since the beginning.

While the other "muscle trucks" sit high on stock suspension, the original MT hunkers down thanks to custom front a-arms holding 2-inch drop spindles and lowering springs up front, and an axle-over-spring setup at the rear.

My 1974 D100 Mopar Muscle Truck made its debut in episode 15 of Roadkill Garage, where this nearly completed project truck finally hit the road. The backstory on this one actually involves the tale of three similar Dodge trucks, beginning with the Bronze 1977 D100 stepside featured in Roadkill episode 40. I've owned that truck since the mid 1990s, and it has been in fairly continuous use since. The drawback to that one is the model year. In California, anything newer than 1975 requires biannual smog inspection, making modification a difficult if not illegal pursuit. Enter the white 1972 D100 fleetside shortbed seen in the background of many episodes of Roadkill Garage and Roadkill Extra. That was built as a replacement for the original 1977 step side solely for it smog exempt status. When a hit and run incident damaged the '72 fleet, the hunt was on for replacement parts to fix it. That led to the U-Pull Parts yard in Bakersfield, California, where the 1974 D100 stepside now known as the Mopar Muscle Truck was found.

Up on blocks in the salvage yard, the MMT already gave up plenty of parts inside and out. Despite that, a few laps around it showed a real jewel in the rough. The factory paint was remarkably good, the body panels were straight, and the entire truck was amazingly rust free. It didn't take long to realize that this was a much nicer truck than the '72 fleetside I was looking to fix. The fact that it was a factory manual shift truck sealed the deal. Some negotiation with the yard had it bought for $900 and it was saved from the crusher.

To provide the pieces to fix all of these trucks, yet another one was acquired just as a parts truck—the black 1975 D100 that was featured as the stripped-out Truck Buggy in episode 3 of Roadkill Garage. That one came in trade for a set of cylinder heads, complete but un-registerable with massive DMV back fees and an ancient bank lien. Many of the parts for the MMT came from this parts truck, including the mint front bumper and grill, radiator, fan shroud, power steering, cowl panel, and an untold number of small parts.

Inside the MMT, virtually nothing was salvageable except the odd split-back bench seat for use as a core. The cab was stripped to the bare firewall, insulated, carpeted, and the entire dash, instrument panel, wiring, and a factory A/C system were all built from nice used and wrecking yard pieces. The great thing about this era of Dodge truck is that parts are still cheap and plentiful at the junkyard, but we don't expect that to last. The seat was sent in to a local shop for new upholstery in a very un-Roadkill-like move, but hey, it is a Roadkill Garage project. We have our own rules. Inside the MMT really is "mint."

 

Under the hood, the 318 engine the truck came with was pulled and replaced with a 360 Mopar small block, I built a few years ago for a feature in the now-defunct Engine Masters magazine. With 10.75:1 compression, a custom Comp solid flat tappet cam, and wild cylinder head and intake manifold porting, the 360 delivered 520 horsepower on the engine dyno. I installed it with Summit long-tube headers leading to a fabricated 3-inch side-hung exhaust using Hooker Aero-Chamber mufflers.

The rest of the drivetrain was assembled from used, salvaged, or fabricated parts. First, the floor-shifted 3-speed manual transmission that came with the truck was replaced with a junkyard A-833 4-speed overdrive trans using a car bellhousing, a used Centerforce clutch, modified OE clutch linkage, and a used OEM Hurst shifter. Overall, the transmission set-up was cheap, but proved to be not so good. The MMT's factory 8 ¼ rear originally just got a welded differential as shown in RKG episode 15, but later was replaced by the 8 ¾ from the laid-up 1972 fleetside truck, complete with a 3.55:1 ratio limited-slip differential. Wheels are salvaged old-school slots that were polished and clear-coated; 15×7 front, and 15×10 rear, with 255 60R-15 and 275 60R-15 tires.

Disaster struck when the 360 engine developed a pinhole coolant leak in cylinder number 3 during the filming of Roadkill Garage episode 20. A hot 318 was swapped in as a stop-gap as featured in Roadkill Extra episode 240, but later changed in Roadkill Garage Episode 21 to the hottest engine yet, a 408 Magnum with 550 horsepower. In that episode the MMT was taken to the track for a shake-down and promptly proved to have an unshiftable trans, an unstable suspension, and then the differential blew. The MMT is really good, but needs to be perfected - maybe in a future episode.

Mazda's Logo, Like Its Stable of Cars, Has Evolved Over 100 Years

 2020 hasn't been totally terrible—among other things, it marked the 100th anniversary of founding of the Toyo Cork Kogyo Company, which we now know as Mazda.

Jujiro Matsuda was an engineer in Osaka, and in 1920 he came home to Hiroshima to open a new company that manufactured cork. His first logo was a red circle with a broken horizontal line, which Matsuda intended to indicate his desire to contribute to the world.



Toyo Kyogo transitioned to manufacture of heavy machinery in 1927, and in 1931 they produced their first vehicle, the Mazda-Go three-wheel truck. The vehicle was named for Ahura Mazda, a Zoroastrian deity whose name literally translates to "god of wisdom," and whose name had a happy similarity to Matsuda's own. In 1934, Toyo Kyogo developed a new Mazda logo, though the company did not officially change its name until 1984.

In 1936, Mazda developed a new logo based on that of its home city. Hiroshima's logo was three wavy lines against a green background, representing the three flows of the Ota River delta. Mazda took the three lines and reformed them to show a stylized M, and the logo was used right until the late 1950s.

Meanwhile, a new simple "MAZDA" badge was needed for export vehicles, and Mazda developed a block-printed version in 1954. Back in the home market, Mazda was developing its first passenger car, the R360. Mazda developed yet another logo, returning to the 1920 circular motif with an M in the middle, elongated at both ends to meet the circle. For the 1964 Cosmo prototype (as well as the 1967 production Cosmo Sport), Mazda embedded this logo in a rounded triangle, a shape familiar to all Mazda rotary-engine fans.



In the mid-70s, Mazda returned to a name logo using block letters and a stylized Z. It remained in use until 1997 and is perhaps the best known of Mazda's logos.

But then the whimsical 1990s rolled around, and Mazda decided it needed something more symbolic. The diamond-in-a-rounded-square logo of 1991 was supposed to recall wings and the sun, but what it really recalled was the Renault logo. Mazda rounded its edges in 1992, and this emblem adorned the first-generation Miata, among other cars.

The current Mazda badge was developed in 1997, employing a wing-like V that meets a squared circle to form an M shape. It's often paired with the block-style lettering that Mazda developed in the 1970s.

2021 Porsche Panamera Sport Turismo Turbo S E-Hybrid First Drive: Silent Killer

"Is this thing on?" After turning the ignition switch located the left side of the dash (yes, Porsche still does that) of the 2021 Porsche Panamera Sport Turismo Turbo S E-Hybrid, the instrument panel and nav screen flash on, but there's no sonic boom, nothing to indicate that its massive stable of 690 horses have sprung to life. Oh right, it always starts in the fully electric E-Power mode.

Porsche wants you to know there's plenty of E in its E-Hybrid Panamera models, and it takes me a second to make sure it's in gear as I silently back up. The top dog of the Panamera line has prodigious power but also a 17.9-kWh battery pack under the trunk plus an electric motor packaged between its 4.0-liter twin-turbo V-8 and PDK eight-speed dual-clutch transmission. Together, they provide the motivation for the Turbo S E-Hybrid to silently stalk about town.

The 2021 Panamera E-Hybrids are being enhanced as part of a refresh of the Panamera lineup as a whole, and a new model, the 4S E-Hybrid, has joined the fray, making three Panamera versions available with a gas-electric package: S, 4S, and Turbo S. (There are Sport Turismo wagon and sedan body styles, with the latter also available in regular and Executive long-wheelbase flavors.) The major headline is the aforementioned battery pack, which Porsche says provides 27 percent more range than the outgoing Turbo S hybrid's 14.1-kWh battery.


The Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid Is Stupid Powerful

Porsche isn't shy about saying the DNA of its E-Hybrid powertrain is derived in part from its seminal 918 Spyder Hybrid supercar, and when you turn the dial of the 2021 Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid to Sport Plus mode and floor the throttle, it's hard to argue. Despite the fact that this car is the better part of 5,300 pounds, its 690 horsepower make it the second most powerful Porsche in the lineup behind the mighty 700-hp 911 GT2 RS.  To get to that massive 690 figure, the Turbo S E-Hybrid combines that 563-hp, 4.0-liter twin-turbo eight (up 13 horses over the 2020 model thanks to several internal enhancements) with an electric motor that packs 134 horsepower and 295 lb-ft of torque. The new car's 642 lb-ft of torque is 89 more than you'll find the GT2 RS, in case you were wondering. Yep, buy this Porsche, and you'll have some bragging rights with the folks at the country club.

With great power comes greater efficiency, or at least that's the plan, though final EPA numbers aren't yet available—Porsche says we'll know those closer to the car's spring 2021 on-sale date. For reference, the 2020 model is rated at 19/22/20 mpg city/highway/combined (gas) and 46/51/48 mpg-e (gas + electric). The Porsche officials we spoke with are confident the Turbo S E-Hybrid will see incremental improvements over the outgoing model, in large part because of the bigger battery pack. Interestingly, the battery doesn't intrude on the Sport Turismo's 14.7 cubic feet of trunk space with the rear seats up, although its charging cables can get in the way when you're throwing gear or groceries in the back.

How Fast Is the '21 Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid?

Efficiency and cargo space really don't matter much, however, when you have one foot on the gas, one on the brake, and the mode in Sport Plus and you hit the Sport Response button, which gives you a 20-second boost of push-to-pass-type power. Let off the brake when the launch control light flashes, and holy hell, does the Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid let loose. There aren't many cars I've driven in my 20 years evaluating vehicles that have delivered such neck-snapping acceleration. Porsche claims the Turbo S E-Hybrid can burst from zero to 60 mph in 3.0 seconds flat. That seems conservative after my launch-controlled rocket toward the horizon. Of course, when 5,300 pounds is hurtling up to that speed and the PDK is walloping through each gear, things seem even more brutal. Take it to the drag strip, and you'll be pulling 11.3-second quarter-mile times, Porsche says. The car has hybrid in its name, sure, but there's nothing hybrid about its ability to lay down stupid fast times from a stop.

The Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid is quick at any speed, really. On my way back to L.A. after dropping off my mom in Phoenix, I got into a tête-à-tête with a Hellcat-powered, blue and black-striped Challenger with a FERL CT vanity license plate. The driver apparently didn't like me passing him and, well, went feral. It only took a quick second or two to show him this hybrid can hang with any Hellcat short of a Demon.

That was the only real drama, though, on the 800-ish-mile round trip to Phoenix and back. I spent much of my time behind the wheel testing the top speed of battery-only power (87 mph, just as Porsche said) and watching the energy regeneration readout on the screen while in Sport Plus mode, as its 7.2-kWh onboard charger helped push energy back into the battery. It would add juice until you had to 21 miles of range and hold there, waiting to either help boost power when you get on the accelerator or further optimize range in Hybrid mode. I saw an indicated 17.8 mpg on the way back to L.A.; not a huge number, but then again, I wasn't exactly trying to win a Sierra Club award.

Porsche put a lot of effort into further optimizing brake feel via a mechanical to by-wire handoff (to aid with energy recuperation) that occurs during the pedal stroke. The carbon-ceramic brake rotors (PCCB in Porsche-speak, and standard on the Turbo S E-Hybrid) are absolutely massive at 16.5 inches up front and 16.1 inches at the rear, and whoa, are they powerful, featuring Acid-Green-dipped 10-piston calipers up front four-piston units in the back. They can be a bit on the touchy side at times in low-speed situations, but overall Porsche has done a fine job of making them feel, well, normal.

A lot of effort was also put into building more of a differentiation between the base and sportier modes thanks to optimization of the Porsche Active Suspension Management system. You really can feel it when the suspension tightens up in Sport Plus, and the ride is far more comfortable and compliant in its base Comfort setting. You can also dial back the damping when you're in Sport Plus, which is a fine option when you want to go fast but don't want to be punished as much over rough pavement, for example, while on the highway. And when you want to kick back and relax, the Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid has adaptive cruise control that works down to 0 mph and lane-keep assist that helped hone my focus during the drab desert portions of my journey to Phoenix and back.


2021 Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid: Interior and Exterior

Spend the better part of 12 hours in a car, and you'll tend to notice some little things. Like the super small amount of stowage space in the center console. Or the fact there's only one USB port, and it's a USB-C, so you better get to Best Buy and buy a cord. Thankfully, there's a wireless phone charger. Although there are myriad seat adjustments to the high-backed sport thrones, there's no massaging feature, which my mom pointed out with sadness.

But as you'd expect, the Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid's interior build quality is first rate, as are the materials. The 12.3-inch touchscreen senses your choices before you even apply pressure, and the haptic buttons flanking the gearshift work flawlessly. To the right and left of the speedo you can customize all manner of displays; the same goes for the infotainment system itself. In the back, the two buckets are separated by a console with a multifunction display. Porsche has upped its game in the interior-experience and safety departments (including all manner of onboard cameras and safety nannies abound) to align with the expectations of today's customers.

In Sport Turismo guise, the Panamera looks like the classiest of wagons, and the second-generation Panamera design is wearing well. For 2021, the changes to the styling are small, including minor updates to the lighting front and rear. You want rims? There are 10 wheel designs to choose from in 20- and 21-inch sizes, including the Exclusive Design 21-inch rollers on the car I drove. They sport bright-polished areas and painted bases, and trick wheel hub covers with colored Porsche crests nicely accented the Papaya Metallic orange paint—a hue you certainly don't see every day.

How Much Is the 2021 Sport Turismo Turbo S E-Hybrid?

At around $193,000 to start when it goes on sale in the spring of 2021, this particular Panamera doesn't come cheap, although it's pretty loaded up for that price (yes, you can option it up further). In the past year or so, I've driven other hot-rod wagons such as the Audi RS 6 Avant and the Mercedes-AMG E63, and there's a lot to be said for both, including that each costs far less than this particular machine.

But there's a cachet to the Turbo S E-Hybrid that's hard to ignore. Some purists may want to do so anyway, of course, given all of its hybrid wizardry, but its mechanicals are also what make it so special—as does silently rolling it out of your garage with the knowledge you can unleash its fury on the world at your command.

2021 Chevrolet Suburban Diesel First Test: The Most Efficient Full-Size SUV

Efficient full-size SUVs are like cheap wagyu beef. They simply don't exist. But when a punchy six-cylinder diesel engine is fitted under the hood, things change. The 2021 Chevrolet Suburban Diesel is rated at 20/26/22 mpg city/highway/combined, which makes it the most fuel-efficient four-wheel-drive full-size SUV in the market. Think about that for a sec.

A diesel Suburban is not novel, but the SUV hasn't been offered with an alternative type of engine for a long time. And although the diesel engine isn't as quick as the 5.3-liter engine, there are more pros than cons. We drove a 2021 Chevrolet Suburban Diesel High Country and took it to the track to compare its handling and performance against a Suburban with the base engine.



2021 Chevrolet Suburban Diesel: The Performance

With 277 hp and 460 lb-ft of torque, the Duramax turbodiesel l-6 engine is buttery smooth and elegantly refined. Like in the Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Diesel, the Duramax engine is quiet and pulls with confidence, getting torque to the tires via a 10-speed automatic transmission.

Given that nearly all of the torque is delivered at 1,500 rpm, the Suburban Duramax doesn't feel slow, either. The engine pulls nicely from the start, and the quick and smooth transmission shifts when it needs to and doesn't hunt for gears to achieve better fuel economy. Need more oomph? Simply press down the throttle, and the gearbox will downshift instantly. We've praised this transmission in the past—both in a gas Suburban and in a diesel Silverado—and we continue to be impressed by its performance and refinement.

Compared to the Suburban's gasoline-powered 5.3-liter V-8, the diesel is a bit louder, but it's hard to notice unless you're paying attention. Chevy fitted additional noise abatement materials under the hood to keep the ride quiet and serene. However, those with good hearing will pick up the common idling clatter of a diesel engine.

Like in the other Suburbans and Tahoes that we've driven, the magnetic ride control suspension coupled with the air ride adaptive dampers make the ride as smooth as possible in a truck this big. Despite the massive 22-inch wheels, the handling in corners and on the freeway feels controlled, though some of the big bumps and ruts on the streets of Los Angeles were noticeable in the cabin. Steering is light for a full-size SUV, but it feels accurate.

You might think of diesels as torquey engines that can tow a lot, and they can. But because the Suburban is already powered by punchy V-8 engines, the six-cylinder diesel doesn't tow as much as the 5.3-liter or 6.2-liter V-8s. The rear-drive Suburban Diesel can tow up to 8,000 pounds, where the four-wheel-drive model can pull 7,800 pounds. Payload capacity is rated at 1,625 and 1,538 pounds, respectively. In contrast, the standard V-8 can tow 8,300 and 8,100 pounds, respectively, and the 6.2-liter is rated at 8,200 and 7,900 pounds.

With our Vbox datalogger in place, a dragstrip to ourselves, and associate road test editor Erick Ayapana behind the wheel, we confirmed what we felt on the streets—the 2021 Chevrolet Suburban Diesel got from 0 to 60 mph in 8.5 seconds, which is 0.9 second slower than the 5.3-liter Suburban Z71 4x4 we last tested. The diesel crossed the quarter-mile mark in 16.6 seconds at 84.9 mph, which is 0.9 second more and 4.7 mph slower. Ayapana described the Suburban diesel as "a little lazy off the line," but said it had "otherwise smooth and strong power delivery."

Of course, very few people will drive the Suburban flat out, but a lot of us will brake harshly in emergency situations. Our diesel stopped from 60 mph in 115 feet on Bridgestone Alenza all-season highway tires, which is a great distance for a full-size SUV. Those numbers compare favorably to the 5.3-liter we tested, which needed 127 feet to stop despite weighing 236 pounds less, but then it was riding on trail-optimized 20-inch Goodyear Wrangler TrailRunner AT tires.

In terms of handling, road test editor Chris Walton had a hard time with the stability and traction control systems, as power cut off constantly during our figure-eight test. As such, it took 32.3 seconds at 0.47 g to complete.


 2021 Chevrolet Suburban Diesel: Price and Availability

LS, LT, RST, Premier, and High Country trims can be powered by the Duramax engine—that's all of the trims except the off-road-ready Z71 (alterations to its front end to optimize approach angle mean the longer inline-six doesn't fit). Upgrading from the 5.3-liter to the diesel adds $995 to the price of an LS, LT, RST, or Premier trims, which is a pretty good price considering all of the benefits. Since High Country models come standard with the more powerful 6.2-liter V-8 engine, ordering one of these with the Duramax diesel six-cylinder will net you a $1,500 discount.

The fair price and availability across the Suburban lineup makes the diesel engine an option worth seriously considering. A significant bump in fuel economy over the 5.3-liter V-8 (15/19 mpg city/highway for four-wheel-drive models), the 4WD Suburban Diesel's 20/26 mpg stands out in a big way. And a two-wheel-drive Suburban Diesel rated 21/27 mpg starts at just $53,990.

Our 4WD Suburban Diesel High Country crossed the checkout counter at $82,495, which is a bit high, but that included $7,400 in extras. The High Country Deluxe package was the most expensive—at $5,555 it adds adaptive cruise control, retractable steps, emergency braking, panoramic sunroof, the air ride adaptive suspension, and the trailer brake controller, among other features.

Should I Buy the 2021 Chevrolet Suburban Diesel?

It doesn't matter what your budget is—if you're looking for a Suburban, the Duramax engine is worth looking at. For less than a grand you will be getting more torque and better fuel economy without much sacrifice in performance. And who doesn't like that?

Wagyu beef may be decades away from becoming affordable, but with the Duramax engine ushers in a new era of fuel-efficient full-size SUVs.

What’s the Best 2021 Honda Accord Hybrid Trim? Here’s Our Guide

If you're considering a 2021 Honda Accord Hybrid—congrats, you're doing it right. The Accord—newly updated for 2021—drives well and is one of the most spacious midsize sedans around. After testing the new model, we'd recommend the hybrid above even the 1.5T or 2.0T models. If you're already set on the Accord Hybrid and aren't sure which model to get, keep reading for our trim review.



 2021 Accord Hybrid Base Trim Pros and Cons

The base Accord Hybrid has the same advantages of every other more expensive Accord Hybrid trim: It's quicker than the Toyota Camry and Hyundai Sonata hybrids and has excellent brake feel, too. The interior is just as spacious as the non-hybrid Accord, which starts just $1,600 lower than the base hybrid model. Every 2021 Accord now gets an 8.0-inch touchscreen with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. The base hybrid even gets hands-free keyless access, which greatly increases its everyday convenience.

Before considering regional incentives, the 2021 Accord Hybrid even manages to undercut the Hyundai and Toyota in price. But what those two competitors offer is superior fuel economy. You'll see an EPA-rated 50/54 mpg city/highway for the Hyundai Sonata Blue hybrid and 51/53 mpg with the Toyota Camry LE hybrid. The Accord earns 48/48 mpg in all but the top Touring trim, which gets 44/41 mpg.

What's especially nice about the base Accord Hybrid trim is that it rolls on the same 17-inch alloy wheels as the higher trims (except for the Accord Toruing)—that's not true of the more efficient base Toyota and Hyundai models. Even so, if it were our money, we would move higher on the trim ladder.


2021 Accord EX Trim Pros and Cons

The 2021 Accord Hybrid starts to hit its sweet spot in the EX trim. It's here that Honda fits the car with newly improved LED headlights (the base trim gets LEDs, just not the same spec) as well as blind-spot monitoring plus a wireless version of Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. The EX also gets a moonroof and a 12-way power driver's seat. Also, compared to the base trim's four-speaker 160-watt sound system, the EX adds four additional speakers in its 180-watt setup.

What will make the 2021 Accord Hybrid EX trim appealing to some buyers is the fact that the non-hybrid Accord no longer offers one; the Sport Special Edition basically takes its place for the 1.5T engine. So if you don't like the Sport trim's flashy 19-inch wheels or reduced fuel economy, the Accord Hybrid EX could be a real option.

2021 Accord EX-L Trim Pros and Cons

Although the price jump from EX to EX-L is only $2,370 compared to the near $4,000 increase from base to EX, this is where the decision becomes a bit more difficult. Aside from leather, the EX-L also throws in a four-way power front passenger seat, parking sensors front and rear, a 450-watt 10-speaker sound system, and a leather-wrapped steering wheel.

This trim might be worth it for the upgraded steering wheel and sound system alone, though some buyers may see value in the power front passenger seat.


2021 Accord Touring Pros and Cons

This is the trim MotorTrend most recently tested, and unlike in previous model years, it rolls on different wheels than the rest of the range. The 2021 Accord Hybrid Touring looks good on the 19-inch wheels it shares with the 2.0T Touring model, but the larger wheels and tires cost too much in ride quality, tire noise, and fuel economy to warrant a recommendation. We'd reluctantly say goodbye to the Touring's ventilated front seats and to its new Low Speed Braking Control tech, which is supposed to help save your car from front and rear bumper dings when it turns out that parking space isn't as big as you thought.

In our test car, no setting made viewing the head-up display comfortable for my taller-than-average 6-foot-4 frame, so I wouldn't miss that. That leaves rain-sensing wipers, heated rear outboard seats, and a passenger-side mirror that tilts down in when you're in reverse (like a luxury car). These are all cool features but not must-haves for the roughly $3,500 jump from the EX-L.
So Which 2021 Accord Hybrid Model Is Best?

The Accord Hybrid does its best work in the EX and EX-L trims. Although the Accord's leather itself didn't impress, the EX-L trim's added feature content could be enticing. But if you don't find a leather-wrapped steering wheel, power passenger seat, and a superior sound system worth stretching the budget for, try the EX.

Newest Porsche 911 GT3 Cup Car Is a Buffer, Better Best-Selling Race Car

From the Nürburgring to Sebring, WEC to IMSA, the hunchbacked, rear-engined 911 GT3 Cup is an extremely familiar sight at racetracks around the globe. Porsche says the GT3 Cup is the world's best-selling race car, and the company just pulled the silk off of its newest incarnation: the seventh-generation, 992-based 911 GT3 Cup. Now, this best-seller is wider, stronger, and faster than ever before.

Porsche says the new car, derived from the street-legal 911, is up to one percent faster per lap than 991.2-based GT3 Cup; around which track isn't clear, so we think the automaker is referring to a general projected average here. "So what?" you might be thinking. While just one solitary percent of one solitary lap doesn't sound that incredible, when added up over the course of dozens (if not hundreds) of laps, it makes a huge difference.



Part of that seemingly small lap-time shave comes from a little extra power. The new GT3 Cup's 4.0-liter, water-cooled flat-six now makes 510 hp, 25 more than its predecessor. It'll rev to 8,400 rpm (up from 7,400) and can also, for the first time, be run on synthetic fuels. Porsche has been looking heavily into alternatives to gasoline, and while the automaker doesn't say whether or not the engine makes less power when run on e-fuels, it does note a significant drop in carbon emissions. That's no bad thing.

The car's engine is connected to a racing-spec sequential six-speed gearbox that weighs just 159 pounds (Porsche's production PDK dual-clutch automatic weighs closer to 260 pounds). Porsche says the gearbox is even quicker-shifting than before, with gearchanges actuated via the carbon-fiber shift paddles behind the steering wheel. For the first time in a 911 GT3 Cup, the steering is an electrical power assist system, doing away with the need for the old model's hydraulic pump and fluid lines.

The new GT3 Cup also features a wider, 911 Turbo-spec body; the resultant increase in track width helps to increase grip relative to the previous GT3 Cup car, which was based on the narrow-bodied 911. The GT3 Cup is now 1.1-inches wider than the old car and can accommodate 12-inch-wide wheels up front and 13-inch-wide wheels at the rear. The front end of the new GT3 Cup adopts a double A-arm front suspension setup like the top-spec 911 RSR (and the new road-going GT3) but maintains a multi-link setup at the rear. Brakes are race-spec steelies by Brembo.



The Cup's fresh new bod is now 70 percent aluminum and 30 percent steel. The previous GT3 Cup was mostly steel, but since aluminum is much lighter than steel, the new car weighs exactly the same as the old car (2,778 pounds dry) in spite of its wider body. To help reach that low weight, the interior is awash with carbon fiber. The steering wheel and dashboard are both made of the stuff and the 10.3-inch digital instrument cluster has been revamped for the new year.

Widening a car impacts the oh-so-delicate aerodynamic balance engineers have to strike between downforce and drag. Luckily, the 992-based GT3 Cup has a totally new aero package to nip that tricky problem in the bud. The rear wing is all-new and adopts an adjustable, swan-neck design for both greater downforce and reduced drag. There's also a brand new front end with NACA-style air ducts to both guide airflow around the car and aid in cooling. On a more mundane level, Porsche also went to great lengths to make repair diagnostics easier, maintain the old car's reliability, and make the driver as comfortable as possible.

All that to say the new 911 GT3 Cup should be one wild (and improved) ride, and it will make its debut at the inaugural Porsche Carrera Cup North America race in March of next year.

Saturday Night Live Lexus Skit Skewers Holiday Car Purchases as Deranged

'Tis the season ... for those luxury car commercials in which people with more money than you take advantage of year-end deals and gift their significant others a new Lexus, Infiniti, Mercedes-Benz, or Audi for the holidays. As many folks have pointed out on social media in recent weeks, this is borderline psychopathic behavior. Who makes such a huge purchase without involving their life partner? Saturday Night Live jumped into the debate this weekend with the skit "December to Remember," satirizing Lexus's holiday deal branding and pointing out exactly why one doesn't just go out and buy a Lexus and have it wrapped in a bow for Christmas.
 


Okay, so the punch line for the skit is obvious—"Give the gift of Lexus, definitely talk it over first"—but the journey to that point is a hilariously unexpected, almost worst-case scenario for the fantasy, car-commercial world of holiday car gift giving. SNL cast members Heidi Gardner and Beck Bennett are the story's tense couple, and the week's host Timothy Chalamet plays their son. After giving Gardner's character one last surprise gift box, which holds a Lexus key, Bennett's character rushes the family outside to see the car. Financial issues immediately come to the fore, as do some personal issues (and lapses in financial competence) plaguing Bennett's character, and, well, just watch the family's descent into interpersonal misery.


Car shopping represents most households' second-biggest purchase next to their homes, so whether you're thinking it's a December to Remember, the Season of Audi, a Mercedes Winter Event, Happy Honda Days, or Toyotathon time, make sure every financial stakeholder involved is, well, involved.

Toyota's Solid-State Battery Prototype Could Be an EV Game Changer

Imagine an electric car battery that provides more than 300 miles of range, charges in approximately ten minutes, requires no bulky heating and cooling systems, maintains 80 percent of its charge capacity for 800 cycles (about 240,000 miles), and isn't prone to spontaneous combustion. Such is the promise of the solid-state car battery, a holy grail that automakers and manufacturers are racing to find. Now, Toyota announced it'll have a running prototype with a solid-state battery ready by next year.



Before you yawn and click the back button on your browser, consider the implications of this technology. Range and charge times are the biggest barriers to EV adoption, and while a ten-minute charge is still quite a bit longer than it takes to fill a gas tank with liquid fuel, it's a lot better than having to make lunch plans while your car recharges. A compact fast-charging battery could be the EV equivalent of the electric starter, as it would allow battery-powered electric cars to conquer internal-combustion power once and for all.

Toyota is far from the sole entrant in this race, nor is it the only company making headlines. Last week, a California company called QuantumScape, which has a strategic partnership with Volkswagen, announced promising test results for its own solid-state cell. Toyota's announcement of its upcoming Euro-market electric SUV included the note that the company plans to have solid-state battery technology in its production vehicles by 2025.



Toyota, in partnership with Panasonic, currently has more than a thousand patents covering solid-state batteries, and Nissan is working on its own solid-state battery, which it claims will appear in a "non-simulation" vehicle by 2028. Toyota does not currently offer a battery-powered vehicle in the United States and hasn't offered one since the 2012-2014 RAV4 EV, but it is about to launch an update of the hydrogen fuel cell powered Mirai. Nissan, meanwhile, offers the Leaf. The brand is also preparing to launch its first electric SUV: the Ariya.

Both Toyota and Nissan have the might of the Japanese government behind them. Japan is assembling a ¥2 trillion fund (around $19 billion) to support decarbonization technology, a significant part of which will be used to support the development of solid-state batteries (particularly the procurement of lithium, of which global reserves are finite). At least two major Japanese mining and oil companies, Mitsui Kinzoku and Idemitsu Kosan, are building infrastructure to produce solid electrolyte.

Japan is hoping early advances in solid-state technology will give it the lead in battery production over China and South Korea. The global market for next-generation batteries (those that perform better than existing lithium-ion batteries) is expected to grow from $39 million this year to $413 million in 2025, $3.1 billion in 2030, and $25.2 billion in 2035.

Needless to say, other companies are well into the race. Samsung has developed a solid-state battery using silver-carbon instead of lithium. This prototype battery has the potential for 500 miles of range in a pack half the size of a modern lithium-ion battery. Additionally, Colorado-based Solid Power is partnering with Ford and BMW to develop battery tech, while Mercedes is working with Hydro-Québec in Canada.

The race to develop a solid-state battery for electric vehicles is on, and if Toyota's plans to produce a running prototype in 2021 come to fruition, then we could very well be looking at the dominant automotive technology of the future within the next year.